Boulder detection |
ratio were also changed by +60 % for each image.
The optimal anchor sizes for the YOLO network
were Calculated. 15 % of the training samples were
‚andomly selected for validation and used to cal-
zulate the average precision for the boulder class
(AP) of the different networks. After the image set
for validation was separated, a Python script ro-
tated every image in 45° steps to account for vari
able survey directions. The training took place on
a NVIDIA 2080 TI graphic card (11 GB RAM). Training
af the MBES models required about twelve hours
for the MBES models and 40 hours for the large
5SS model.
For model application, the training procedure is
reversed. The (single or multi-band) mosaic is cut
'nto small georeferenced image tiles of 64 x 64
pixels. Threshold values for include objects were
set to 0.2 for all models except the SSS model for
small objects, which was set to 0.35. The model is
run on these small tiles. The detection of objects
an a single image requires about 10 ms on an
NVIDIA 2080 TI. The pixel-coordinates of the result-
'ng bounding boxes are converted to geographic
zoordinates and displayed using QGIS. To emulate
the raster approach used by human experts to
cover large areas, detected boulders in each grid
cell are counted.
Jp also controls the local slope shown in Fig...
Nhile high pixel-to-pixel slopes exceeding 60° at
Maximum prevail in the areas of glacial lag depos-
ts due to the presence of boulders and near the
;rawl marks, the remaining area is flat with slope
/alues below 2°.
3ased on a visual inspection, we find most boul
ders in the area composed of glacial lag deposits,
with some also present in the sandy facies. The
»o0ulders have different characteristics in the data
sets that are displayed in Fig. 3. In the SSS-derived
dackscatter mosaics, boulders can be recognised
»y a high backscatter front, an intermediate in
tensity signal behind and an acoustic shadow at
"he back, relative to the side-scan sonar position.
dowever, small boulders are often more difficult to
nterpret. This is caused either by their small size
ar their position in the outer part of the swath (a
zombination of which is shown in Fig. 3B). In addi-
tion, artefacts in side-scan sonar data can resem
le smaller boulders. Such artefacts include scatter
from water column stratification or areas near the
side-scan sonar nadir.
‚n MBES-derived backscatter, boulders are rec
ognised by an increase in backscatter intensity
z:ompared to the surrounding seafloor (Fig, 3) but
are often lacking a pronounced acoustic shadow.
The backscatter representation of boulders is less
distinct compared to SSS imagery in close to inter
mnediate distance to the nadir. Boulders are imaged
3s circular to elliptic features in maps of the local
slope. Slope values for boulders range from 3.5° to
more than 60° degrees, related to the large vari-
aty of boulder shapes in transported lag deposits
transported by glaciers. Also, boulders may be par-
tjally buried in the subsurface. However, not all cir
zular features correspond to increased backscattet
ntensities, for example in the areas of overlapping
ırofiles. In MBES-derived maps of depth, boulders
are displayed as circular features elevated 2.5 cm
to over 50 cm compared to the adjacent seafloor.
> Results
3.1 Local geology and appearance of boulders
Water depths in the investigation site (approxi-
mately 2 km?) vary between 16 m and 25 m, with
depths increasing towards the north. Backscatter
maps derived from MBES and SSS show different
zeafloor facies at the site (Fig. 2), with fine-grained
deposits and intensive disturbance by bottom
trawling activities in the north (low backscatter).
nigh backscatter intensities characterise glacial
1ag deposits towards the south and east. A high
1umber of boulders are part of these deposits. In-
termediate backscatter intensities towards south
and west characterise fine to medium sands and
Dartial outcrops of glacial lag deposits. In the side
scan sonar mosaics, which cover a larger area, a
series of elongated, elevated ridges exist in the
southeast The general sedimentological build-
3.2 Manual boulder identification
zor a test area of about 30,000 m}, two experi
anced human interpreters picked boulders on the
side-scan sonar backscatter mosaic (Fig. 4). The
test area showcases instances of water column
Et 1 n- 26
Zymart II a— 5
"manıntari
Owen
"ig. 4: Manual interpretation of boulder occurrence in the test area hased on SSS backscatter data
ıhe number of identified obiects is 26 and 54. Refer to Fig. 2 for locatior
0
25
50 m
a!
AA
119 — 06/2021