R. Feistel et al.: Oceanographic application and numerical implementation of TEOS-IO: Part 1
647
www.ocean-sci.net/6/633/2010/
Ocean Sci., 6, 633-677, 2010
and the potential density from Eq. (S14.1), pe, library func
tion air_potdensity_si,
-l
Pg
dh AW (A, i],P r )\
SPr ) A ' V
(4.45)
In terms of the Primary Standard functions and their indepen
dent variables (Sect. 2), Eq. (5.1) is expressed by the system
^Jr 1 ( 7' ^ W \ ^
/ F (i> w ) + P7„ F (r,„'*')
= / F (r,p'j+p'7J(r,p'j
Evidently, for any fixed reference pressure, P r , the value of
/z AV (A,r), P r ) and its partial derivatives, as well as any other
arbitrary function depending on this triple of variables, re
main unchanged during isentropic processes (rj = const) at
constant specific humidity (A = const).
Physically reasonable values of the entropy to be used
as an independent variable of the enthalpy are restricted to
ranges depending on humidity and pressure, between the par
ticular limits given by dry and saturated air, see Sect. 5.8.
5 Level 4: Phase equilibria and composite systems
Equilibrium properties at phase transition boundaries or of
coexisting phases are often characterized by drastic spatial
or temporal changes, and large values of latent heat exchange
or volume expansion, e.g. if seawater freezes or evaporates.
Such multi-phase and multi-component properties are avail
able from combinations of the thermodynamic potentials if
they are consistently adjusted to reference state conditions
which fix the absolute energies and entropies of the sub
stances involved (Feistel et al., 2008). Gibbs functions can
be constructed for composite systems such as sea ice (Feistel
and Hagen, 1998, Sect. 5.4) that contain two stable phases
(e.g. ice and seawater). When the temperature, the volume
or the pressure of a composite system is changed, mass is
transferred from one phase to the other; for example if sea
water freezes or evaporates, brine salinity or vapour pressure
adjust to the new conditions imposed and the heat capacity
or the thermal expansion of the whole system exhibits very
large changes resulting from the changes in latent heat contri
butions. By utilizing mutually consistent potential functions,
rigorous mathematical formulae can be determined for the
numerical calculation of latent properties depending on the
particular conditions such as isobaric, isochoric or isentropic
processes.
5.1 Equilibrium liquid water-vapour: saturation
The saturation point of pure water is usually computed at
a given temperature T, providing the vapour pressure P —
P vap (r), or at a given pressure P providing the boiling tem
perature T — r boll (P). The defining condition is equality of
the chemical potentials of liquid and vapour, which equal the
Gibbs functions in the case of pure phases,
g w (P,P) =g w (T,P). (5.1)
(p W f fp( T ’P W ) = P (5-3)
(p v ) 2 /j(r,p v )=P (5.4)
which exploits the relations (Eqs. S2.6 and S2.ll) to avoid
stacked numerical iterations. Eq. (5.2) is equivalent to
Eq. (5.1) and is also known as the “Maxwell condition” in
p w
the form / |Vj—^-Jdp=0. Equations (5.2)-(5.4) provide
p v
three equations for the four unknowns T, P, p v and p w .
Any one of these quantities can be specified independently
to complete the system and permit the numerical solution as
discussed in Appendix A3.
Once the values of T, P, p v and p w are computed from
the iteration of Eqs. (5.2)-(5.4) at the specified saturation
condition, various equilibrium properties can be determined
from the formulae given in Table S15.
5.2 Equilibrium water-ice: melting and freezing
The melting pressure of ice is usually computed at a given
temperature T, giving P melt (r). Similarly, the freezing tem
perature of water is normally determined at a given pressure
P, giving P frz (P), which also gives the melting temperature
of ice. In either case, the defining condition is equality of the
chemical potentials of liquid water and ice,
g w (T,P) =g m (T,P). (5.5)
In terms of the Primary Standard functions and their indepen
dent variables (Sect. 2), Eq. (5.5) is represented as the system
f (P, p w ) + p w /J (p, p w ) = g lh (T, P) (5.6)
(p W f fp( T 'P W ) = P ’ (5 ' 7)
which exploits the relations (Eqs. S2.6 and ES2.11) to avoid
stacked numerical iterations. Equations (5.6) and (5.7) sup
ply two equations for the three unknowns P, P and p w .
Specifying any one of these quantities completes the deter
mination of the system which can then be solved as discussed
in Appendix A4.
Once the values of P, P and p w are computed from the
iteration of Eqs. (5.6), (5.7) at the specified melting condi
tion, various equilibrium properties can be determined from
the formulae given in Table S16.