Underwater photogrammetry
HN 116 — 06/2020
25
by bundle adjustment over all Included observa
tions.
Mapping underwater structures using
photogrammetrlc technlgues as the only acquisi
tion method, or as part of a multi-sensor system,
has been widely performed In tasks such as reef
monitoring (Fabrl et al. 2019), Inspection of ship
hulls (Kim and Eustlce 2013) or cave surveying
(Nocerlno et al. 2018). Ship wrecks were observed
and modelled by Prado et al. (2019) by fusion with
MBES data. Further examples of photogrammetrlc
wreck surveys, mostly In relatively clear water con
ditions, can be found In Drap et al. (2015) or Nomes
et al. (2015).
Fig. v. Plan view of a io cm raster of the MBES sounding data set of the wreck.
Colour coding depicts depth
2 Methodology
This paper presents data from a campaign carried
out by BSH and Jade University of Applied Scienc
es, surveying a sunken former German air force
vessel from WWII, 25 m In length and about 4 m
In width. The wreck Is located at a depth of about
14 m (relative to NHN) In the Bay of Neustadt (Bal
tic Sea). The MBES data was collected from the
hydrographic survey vessel VWFS Deneb, operat
ed by BSH. A ROV egulpped with a camera to ac-
gulre Imagery for photogrammetrlc analyses was
subseguently deployed from the vessel. The re
sulting point cloud was fused with the MBES data
In order to georeference the photogrammetrlc
Imagery.
2.1 Multibeam echo sounder data set
The MBES data set was collected from Deneb using
a Teledyne-Reson Seabat 7125-SV2 (400 kHz) with
512 beams per swath. The software Teledyne PDS
was used for real-time data acgulsltlon and guallty
control. Five survey lines were collected over the
wreck, three In the west-east direction and two In
the north-south direction. The data was further
post-processed using Teledyne-CARIS HIPS & SIPS.
Fig.,..], shows the 0.10 m depth raster generated
from the sounding data over and In the vicinity
of the wreck. The wreck consists of about 71,866
points over an area of 203.5 m 2
The total sounding uncertainty was calculated
based on all estimated and measured uncertainty
sources and propagated to the 3D position of the
soundings. The soundings comprising the wreck
have an uncertainty of 15 cm at the 95 % confi
dence level.
2.2 ROV and imagery data set
The ROV observations were carried out with a
SAAB SeaEye Falcon ROV ®.g ; .2, left). The ROV has
a depth rating of 300 m and Is capable of carrying
up to 8.5 kg of additional payload. As the on-board
ROV-camera did not provide sufficient resolution
and stability for these photogrammetrlc analyses,
an additional Industrial-grade Easier Ace camera
was mounted In a pressure housing on top of the
Fig. 2: ROV equipped with camera system on top (left) and camera in pressure housing (right)
ROV ©.g...2, right). Relevant technical specifications
are summarised In Table© and Table 2.
The camera housing was egulpped with a
hemispherical port to reduce Image degradation
Introduced by the optical properties of water.
These Include mainly refraction and dispersion
as a perfectly centred port would eliminate these
effects completely and work as an additional lens
element In the ray path. Deviations due to Imper
fect fitting of the dome can mostly be compen-
Saab SeaEye Falcon
Maximum depth
300 m
Forward speed
> 3 kn
Weight
55 kg
Dimensions
moo mm X 6oo mm x 500 mm
Maximum added payload
8.5 kg
Table i: ROV specifications
Basler Ace acAig2o-48gc
Sensor size
9.2 mm x 5.8 mm
Resolution
1920 px X 1200 px
Maximum frame rate
50 Hz
Pixel pitch
4.8 pm x 4.8 pm
Focal length
4.8 mm
Table 2: Camera specifications