Skip to main content

Full text: Temperature assimilation into a coastal ocean-biogeochemical model

Ocean Dynamics (2019) 69:1217–1237 1223 concentrations of the BGC variables. In this case, the statistical update computed by the LESTKF can result in negative concentrations. As in Yu et al. (2018), these values were reset to zero but occurred only in a few cases in the experiments. The experiment STRONG-log performs the assimilation using the logarithm of the concentrations. The experiments allow us to assess whether the cross- covariances between SST and BGC model fields are sufficiently well estimated to result in an improvement of the BGC fields. For this, the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean error (bias) between the state estimate from each data assimilation experiment with regard to the in situ validation data are computed. To assess the impact of the SST data on the modelled surface temperature and salinity we also compute the RMSE with regard to the assimilated data as well as RMSE and bias with regard to independent in situ data of temperature and salinity. 5 Results To analyse the assimilation results, first the influence on the surface temperature and salinity are assessed. Then, the effect of the weakly coupled assimilation on the biogeochemical model fields is examined, and finally, the effect of the strongly coupled assimilation is assessed. 5.1 In?uence of the assimilation on surface temperature and salinity The effect of assimilating satellite SST data on the physical ocean state was already discussed by Losa et al. (2012, 2014), so no detailed analysis is performed here. Figure 4 shows the RMSE with regard to the assimilated SST observations for the analysis and forecast fields each 12 h as a time series for both model grids. For the forecasts, the RMSE is computed with observations that have not yet been assimilated. Given that the coverage of the SST observations varies in between the analysis times, the observations at the forecast time are partly independent, while they are not independent for the analysis. Nonetheless, the values of the RMSE for the forecast and analysis are very similar. Since HBM-ERGOM uses a one-way coupling between the physical and biogeochemical models, the physical model fields are identical in the experiments WEAK and STRONG. The assimilation of SST data pulls the SST in the model toward the observations while accounting for the uncertainty in both the model state and the observations. Fig. 4 RMS error with regard to the assimilated SST observations over time. The upper panel shows the RMSE for the coarse model grid while the lower panel shows the fine grid. The lines are (green) the RMSE for the free model run, (black) the values directly after the analysis step and (blue) the RMSE for the 12-h forecasts
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.