The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2, 2018
ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium “Towards Photogrammetry 2020”, 4-7 June 2018, Riva del Garda, Italy
This contribution has been peer-reviewed.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-961-2018 | ©Authors 2018. CC BY4.0 License.
962
Figure 1. Refraction based on the true local water surface (blue), a assumed horizontal water surface (purple) and a assumed locally
titled water surface (red) resulting in a lateral displacement dXYhz and dXY t n t and a height displacement dZh z and dZ t n t .
This contribution complements the numerical simulation by an
experimental validation of wave pattern induced coordinate er
rors for a real world scenario. The aim of the paper is to examine
how the coordinate errors predicted in our simulation correspond
to the errors derived from real measurement data acquired from
a 12 by 50 meter open air wave pool. For this purpose, we apply
the most simple refraction correction method assuming a hori
zontal water surface as well as the more complex refraction cor
rection method with local surface tilt on the raw measurement
data. We compare the refraction corrected data with terrestrial
reference data to assess the coordinate errors remaining in the
data after conventional refraction correction. The depth coordi
nates displacement is derived from the data on the pool bottom
whereas planimetric coordinate displacements can be determined
from points on the pool wall. In addition to the analysis of the
measurement data we use our simulation to predict systematic
coordinate errors with respect to both refraction correction meth
ods mentioned above. For this purpose, we expand our modeling
approach to the local water surface tilt based on our previous find
ings referring to a horizontal water surface. By choosing suitable
simulation parameters we can reproduce the wave pattern like it
is actually present in the measurement data.
The paper is structured in the following way: Section 2 briefly
describes the experimental setup and the acquired reference and
measurement data. The methods for numerical simulation and
experimental validation are given in section 3 and 4. In section
5, the results are presented and discussed whereas section 6 sum
marizes the work and addresses future tasks.
2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
For the experimental investigations we chose an open air wave
pool which has a total length of 50 m and a width of 12 m. With
its wave generation possibilities as well as with its regular geom
etry and good reflection properties, the pool seems well suited for
a validation study. The bottom of the pool slopes from 0.3 m to a
maximum water depth of 1.5 m (at horizontal water surface ). The
wave machine produces regular waves with amplitudes of about
0.5 m, which are characterized by braking crests and whitecaps
especially in shallow water. The experimental setup offers con
trolled examination conditions by reliably producing waves with
known parameters, low water turbidity and a fixed precisely mea
surable water bottom geometry.
The reference data was collected by terrestrial laser scanning
while the wave pool was empty. To achieve a dense represen
tation of the water bottom geometry the pool was scanned with a
Riegl LMS-Z420Ì from five different positions. Figure 2 shows
the data acquisition as well as the resulting reference point cloud.
The airborne survey campaign was carried out in the filled state
under wavy as well as smooth water surface conditions (fig. 3).
The LiDAR bathymetry data was acquired with a RIEGL VQ
820G LiDAR system in different flying heights (500 m, 600 m,
700 m) and flight directions (in direction of wave propagation and
across). The laser beam divergence of 1 mrad results in a laser
footprint with a diameter of approximately 0.5 m to 0.7 m at the
water surface. Figure 3 shows a profile of the ALB point cloud
under wavy conditions.
3. NUMERICAL SIMULATION
The numerical simulation of wave pattern induced effects on re
fraction and thus on the planimetric and depth coordinates of wa
ter bottom points requires water surface modeling, bottom surface
modeling and ray path modeling.
For the water surface modeling we used Tessendorf’s oceano
graphic statistics based surface wave model for ocean waves
(Tessendorf, 2001 ). The model treats each wave height as a ran
dom variable of its planimetric position at a given time t. Based
on Tessendorf’s model a height field is generated by means of
Fast Fourier transform (FFT). The height field represents a realis
tic ocean surface in the form of a dense regular grid. The charac-