L. Kattner et al.: Monitoring compliance with sulfur content regulations of shipping fuel
10091
www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10087/2015/
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,10087-10092, 2015
December 2014
195
_Q 145
Q.
Q.
■- 95
O
z
45
-5
10.12.2014 12.12.2014 14.12.2014 16.12.2014
January 2015
December 2014
45
.o 35
a.
Ê 25
O 15
i/t
5
-5
10.12.2014 12.12.2014 14.12.2014 16.12.2014
January 2015
Figure 2. Comparison of absolute NO and SO2 volume mixing ratio values measured over 2 weeks, 1 week in December 2014 and 1 week
in January 2015 with comparable wind conditions. Each peak belongs to one emission plume of an individual ship. The reduction in SOg in
2015 is obvious, while for NO, no reduction can be observed.
Autumn 2014 January 2015
Sulfur content in fuel [% m/m] Sulfur content in fuel [% m/m]
Figure 3. Sulfur fuel content in autumn 2014, and in January 2015,
after the change of fuel regulations. The lengths of the ships that
have been analysed are colour-coded. While in 2014 only small
ships had fuel sulfur contents below 0.2%, nearly all ships fell into
this category in January 2015.
5 Conclusions
In this study, we have used the method of in situ measure
ments of trace gases to implement a system to monitor com
pliance of ships with sulfur fuel content regulations. This
has been discussed and suggested before (Balzani Loov et
al., 2014). Here we present a suitable location for perma
nent stationary measurements near Hamburg harbour, one
of the largest harbours in Europe, and demonstrate a mea
surement approach that successfully characterises emissions
from passing ships. We describe the method used to identify
ship emission events and the corresponding ships and present
a large data set on fuel usage of ships of 1413 analysed ship
plumes altogether. This includes one of the first data sets af
ter the most recent regulation change in the North Sea SEC A,
Sulfur content in fuel [% m/m]
Length of
ships in m
■ >300
■ 250-300
■ 200-250
■ 150-200
■ 100-150
■ 50-100
■ 0-50
Figure 4. Detailed view of the January 2015 data set. The lengths
of the ships are colour-coded; the red line indicates the 0.1 % limit,
with the shaded area representing the upper limit uncertainty of
30 %. The blue line indicates the suggested limit of 0.15 % for flag
ging ships as exceeding the sulfur fuel content limit allowed.
where fuel sulfur content limits were reduced from 1 to 0.1 %
on 1 January 2015.
Our data show that the vast majority (95.4%) of all the
ships we have measured are indeed complying with the
new regulation of 0.1 % sulfur fuel content. Compliance has
dropped slightly compared to the value of more than 99 %
observed for the 1 % sulfur limit in autumn 2014. It should
be noted that the global oil price and thus MGO costs for
the necessary sulfur quality in January 2015 was the lowest