accessibility__skip_menu__jump_to_main

Full text : Comparison of three airborne laser bathymetry data sets for monitoring the German Baltic Sea Coast

Downloaded  From:  http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/  on  10/22/2015  Terms  of  Use:  http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx

Chiroptera  and  HawkEyell  sensors  of  Airborne  Hydrography  AB.  The  HawkEyell  sensor  can  emit  more  powerful
pulses  with  the  drawback  of  a  relatively  low  pulse  rate  of  4  kHz  compared  to  the  Chiroptera  sensor.  Also,  data  from  the
HawkEye  sensor  were  only  available  for  areas  which  are  too  deep  for  obtaining  measurements  with  the  Chiroptera  sensor.
To  enable  a  fair  comparison  between  all  sensors  we  therefore  excluded  the  HawkEye  data  from  our  study.  The  third  data
set  was  gathered  by  Aerodata  Surveys,  the  Netherlands,  in  mid-May  2014  with  the  Chiroptera  sensor.  For  both
Chiroptera  flights  the  height  was  400  m  above  ground.  23  strips  with  an  overlap  30%  and  three  cross-strips  in  the  second
campaign  as  well  as  20  strips,  again  with  an  overlap  30%,  and  one  cross-strip  in  the  third  campaign  were  obtained.  Using
these  two  flight  campaigns  a  comparison  with  respect  to  water  turbidity  was  possible.  The  Chiroptera  sensor  is  composed
of  two  lasers,  an  infrared  laser  (X  =  1064  nm,  200  kHz  pulse  rate)  and  a  green  laser  (X  =  532  nm,  35  kHz  pulse  rate).  The
green  laser  of  the  Riegl  VQ-820-G  sensor  and  the  Chiroptera  sensor  are  claimed  to  penetrate  water  to  one  and  1.5  Secchi
depths,  respectively,  under  good  conditions  [16,  17].  Secchi  depths  were  measured  at  several  locations  by  vessels
simultaneously  to  the  laser  data  acquisitions.  Table  1  shows  the  parameters  of  the  three  flights  and  the  mean  Secchi
depths  which  were  observed  during  each  campaign.

Table  1.  Parameters  of  the  three  flight  campaigns.

First  Campaign

Second  Campaign

Third  Campaign

Date

31  Oct.  -  14  Nov.  2012

28-29  Sept.  2013

5-12  May  2014

Sensor

Riegl  VQ-820-G

AHAB  Chiroptera

AHAB  Chiroptera

Flight  height

500  m

400  m

400  m

Measurement  rate

-  (X  =  1064  nm)
149  kHz  (X  =  532  nm)

200  kHz  (X  =  1064  nm)
35  kHz  (X  =  532  nm)

200  kHz  (X  =  1064  nm)
35  kHz  (X  =  532  nm)

Overlap

70%

30%

30%

Reachable  depth 1

1  x  Secchi  depth

1.5  x  Secchi  depth

1.5  x  Secchi  depth

Mean  Secchi  depth

6.8  m

8.0  m

5.8  m

The  three  data  sets  were  delivered  in  LAS-format  that  included  the  3D  point  coordinates  along  with  an  intensity  value.  In
order  to  compensate  for  the  different  speed  of  light  in  water  and  air,  and  to  take  into  account  the  change  of  direction  of
the  light  at  the  water  surface,  the  coordinates  of  the  seabed  points  were  appropriately  corrected  by  the  data  providers.
They  additionally  classified  the  points  into  the  six  classes  water  surface,  seabed,  underwater  vegetation,  underwater
object,  onshore,  and  noise.  Some  statistics  of  the  classified  points  for  the  three  data  sets  are  summarized  in  Table  2.  The
number  of  points  classified  as  water  surface  in  the  first  campaign  is  clearly  smaller  than  in  the  other  campaigns,  in  spite
of  the  higher  strip  overlap.  Only  few  pulses  result  in  two  or  more  echoes,  thus  mainly  single  echoes  are  observed.  This
effect  is  also  described  in  [18]  for  a  river  site  using  the  same  sensor.  In  addition,  due  to  the  higher  flight  altitude  the  total
amount  of  the  points  is  smaller  compared  to  the  two  flights  with  the  Chiroptera  sensor,  which  result  in  similar  numbers
of  points  per  class.  In  general  the  amount  of  points  classified  as  underwater  object  is  negligible,  although  a  few  rocks  are
known  to  be  located  in  this  area.  As  one  result  of  the  project  it  can  be  stated  that  the  detection  of  underwater  objects
solely  in  ALB  data  is  still  challenging  in  our  test  sites.

Table  2.  Statistics  of  the  classified  points.

First  Campaign

Second  Campaign

Third  Campaign

Class)  Sensor

Riegl  VQ-820-G

AHAB  Chiroptera

AHAB  Chiroptera

Water  surface

14,637,978

(15.4  %)

118,412,469

(42.0  %)

94,489,927

(33.2  %)

Seabed

57,807,774

(60.9  %)

98,839,172

(35.1  %)

91,636,326

(32.2  %)

Underwater  vegetation

41,237

(0.00  %)

15,483,702

(5.50  %)

14,377,054

(5.05%)

Underwater  object

0

(0.00  %)

180

(0.00  %)

0

(0.00  %)

Onshore

22,138,957

(23.3  %)

49,037,845

(17.4  %)

84,271,762

(29.6  %)

Sum

94,848,546

281,773,368

284,785,069

1  as  specified  by  the  manufacturer

Proc.  of  SPIE  Vol.  9638  96380Z-3
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.