Ocean Dynamics
Ö Springer
Transect number
Fig. 23 Mean correlation between the forecasts (blue) and between the MME and the forecasts (red) at transects in regions I- VII for time series covering
the period 01.04.2013-31.05.2015. The number of data points and products involved in the statistics are also indicated
the MME median are FCOOGETM and BSHHBM at most
transects in regions IV-VI and RBINSOPTOSNOS in re
gions I and II. The high RMSD of FCOO GETM in region
VII, already detected in Fig. 23, is caused by opposed transport
patterns in the data.
5 Summary
A description of a new MME for SST, SSS, SSC, and TRA has
been provided, and the contributing individual ocean forecasting
models have been presented. The models are characterized by
differences in numerical schemes, parametrizations, boundary
conditions, forcing fields, and spatial resolutions. The processes
of the MME system have been described, and some examples of
the daily products including ensemble statistics such as standard
deviation, ensemble mean, and ensemble median have been
shown. In this study, the uncertainty between the forecasts is
mainly expressed by the standard deviation and individual
methods of comparisons, such as CV index or RMSD.
In the daily products, high standard deviation for SSS was
detected mainly in the Skagerrak and Kattegat, thus the Tran
sition Area between North Sea and Baltic Sea. SSC are eval
uated by standard deviation, stability, and angular difference
between the MME mean and the nominal MyOcean product.
Regions with low current strength in the MME mean are ac
companied by high relative uncertainty between the forecasts.
However, as expected, the standard deviation is high in re
gions with stronger currents, since it scales with the absolute
current values. Areas of high and low standard deviation vary
also with the tides. The PVDs, calculated from the SSC time
series, revealed a variety of patterns typical for different re
gions of the study area ranging from tidally dominated in the
North Sea to density- and wind-driven currents in the Transi
tion Area and the Baltic Sea. Large disagreements in the time
series and corresponding PVDs of the forecasts are caused by
variations in current amplitude and phase. These differences
are possibly related to the different boundary conditions and
turbulence schemes of the models. The deviation of transport
data is expressed by the variation coefficient which was found
Fig. 24 The normalized RMSDs
between the time series of each
product and the MME median
covering the period 01.04.2013-
31.05.2015 are displayed for each
region I-VII
n I I r
I
n I I I I I r
II
n I I I I i r
III
n I I I r
IV
n I I r
V
H I I I I I i r
VI
n r
VII
• BSH_CMOD
• DMLHBM
-
• METUK_FOAM
-
• RBINS_OPTOS_NOS
-
•
• BSHJHBM
-
• .
-
ft"
•
•
•
•
•
_
• . * •
•
• •
_
• •
• « * •
• :
•.
* 1
• •
-
. • .
-
t
•.. •
J I I L
• • • • a
•
J 1 1 1 1 1 L
• ; • * *
J 1 1 1 1 1 L
•
• •
i : 5 * •
J 1 1 1 L
it«!
• 2 ft
* • «
J 1 1 L
•
• , • • > | t
J 1 1 1 1 1 1 L
•
ft
ft •_
J l_
1 47101514 13 12 11 19 20 23 22 21 9 6 5 2 28 27 26 25 24 46 45 44 43 52 50 49 41 36 32 30 29 38 42
Transect Number