Die Küste, 81 (2014), 273-290
278
of the former V3-NOKU-setup calculated by the previous version of the BSHcmod
model, which covers die 14 years from 2000 to 2013. The resolution of that setup was
half of the resolution of the currently used V4 NOKU-setup. Data from die V4-NOKU-
setup calculated by die BSHcmod V4 is archived from 2008 onwards.
Because bodi die NA- and the NOKU-setup of die described BSH-HBM model sys
tem are still in pre-operational mode, only results from the EL-setup calculated by HBM
is archived at die moment. From diis setup die output is available since April 2013.
3 Validation
A quantitative comparison of model results with different kinds of observations — often
referred to as validation - is an important step in the operational model development cy
cle. Even though the model version presented here is still at a pre-operational stage and
some calibration steps need further iteration, die results presented below already give an
estimate of die lower limit of the quality of the upcoming operational model version.
The year 2008 was chosen as the main validation period because a comprehensive
observational data set was already available for diis year. A hindcast run initialized in
November 2007 was carried out as basis for die validation. Some results of die validation
of water level, currents, water temperature, salinity and sea ice will be presented in this
section.
3.1 Water level
To analyse die simulated water levels it is sensible to split die analysis into two parts, re
spectively subsections: The first one on die Nordi Sea, where tides are die main compo
nent of the local sea level elevation, so tiiat die quality of die model output depends
mainly on die quality of the simulated tides. Therefore botii tides and total water levels
were analysed in this subsection. The second subsection is focused on the Baltic Sea,
where tides are virtually absent and only die total water levels are considered.
3.1.1 North Sea
As outlined in section 2.3 die tidal boundary conditions in die applied NOKU-setup are
based on die 19 dominating tidal constituents. Moreover die validation period is only one
year, so tiiat a complete tidal analysis of die data is not feasible. Instead die analysis will
be restricted to die two dominating semi-diurnal tidal constituents M2 and S2. A harmon
ic analysis of die modeled data yields the results given in Tab. 1 when compared with
harmonic constants analysed from observations by the French Service Hydrographique et
Océanographique de la Marine (SHOM 1982).