Skip to main content

Full text: R&D-Project - Identification of organic compounds in the North and Baltic Seas

64 
5.3.3.3 PCA result comparability, own techniques 
Zencak el al. (2005) could show that deviations between PCA results obtained by 
different detection methods do not exceed the precision of a single methodology. Long 
term precision for spiked samples (five parallels over 4 months) was between 6-13 % 
depending on the tested method. The long term method precision for naturally exposed 
fish livers (five parallels over 4 months) includes additionally homogeneity variations of 
the sampling material. It was for the different techniques at maximum: 
ECNI-LRMS: <12 % (sPCAs), <18 % (mPCAs) 
CH4/CH2CI2-NICI-LRMS: <28 % (sPCAs), <10 % (mPCAs) 
EI-MS/MS: <20 % for s+mPCAs. 
• Main sources of uncertainty and systematic errors are: 
• Homogeneity variations and analyte losses during clean-up. 
• Integration of a signal hump over a retention time range of several minutes is 
highly dependent on base-line definition and not well handled by any integration 
programme. 
• Concentrations of single congener groups are often not too much above the 
quantification limit (defined at a signal-to-noise ratio of 10:1). Noise fluctuations 
increase the measuring uncertainty. This is particularly valid for formula and 
congener group-specific methods. 
Table 12 shows that deviations between different quantification methods are well within 
20 % for spiked samples and around this value for real samples with lower levels. 
CH2CI2/CH4-NICI gives often somewhat lower concentrations due to a complete 
suppression of remaining interferences. This method was mainly applied for the 
determination of formula and congener group pattern in sediments.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.