Chlorophyll a surface, 2021, from filtration 
Chlorophyll a surface, 2021, from ctd — only at 
oositions with in-situ chlorophyll a 
K000i a 
m 
< 
örophylil a [ug/L]| 
from filtration 
surface 
ATOOS-2 
] B _ 02.-22.07.2021 
BB EA m un 2 24 2 Om 
Chlorophyll a, difference (filtered — ctd) 
"JE N DE — MN — NEN — == 
nd 
Chlorophyll a [ug/L] 
CTD 
Surface 
AT008-2 
02.-22.07.2021 
rm — —— Sn “OH 
Rd 4 DZ 0° Los kb 8 
Chlorophyll a surface, 2021, from ctd — all stations 
[NY EN—_VOSENEN_— SEES ——— EEE _—_ Vin —__. 
X 
- 
Wa 
Wa 
Shl a (pg/L] 
"*3red-ctd) 
“ ‚face 
006-2 a 
22.07.2021 , 
— fi 
} 
zo 
m 
Regression Chlorophyll a filtered versus ctd, 
linear 
Chl a in situ versus CTD - AT006-2 summer 2021 
-—- | 
* data 
——— fitted curve 
U 
Sn LeQIL] 
CTOD all stations 
surface 
ATOOG-2 
J2.07.-22.07.2021 
a —— nr 
a 
is 
U 
Regression Chlorophyll a filtered versus ctd, 
quadratic 
Chl a in situ versus CTD - ATO0S-2 summer 2021 
data “ 
—  -fitted Curve 
; 
2 
y= 0.4451 * x + 0.4365 
6 > 
n situ chl a [ug/L7 
y=-0.03254 * x + 0.7673 * x + 0.1777 
; 6 8 
in situ chl a [@9/L] 
10 
Figure 3.3 (top) Chlorophyll a distribution at surface from filtration (left) and from CTD, only 
stations with in situ chl a (right), (middle) chlorophyll a difference between filtration and CTD 
(left) and chlorophyll a from CTD, all stations(right), (bottom) chlorophyll a filtered versus 
from CTD, (left) linear fit (right) quadratic fit. 
26