<rahmann et al.
24°N ;
M116/*
M119
- -M130
Wiss
SFB 754 cruises 2016-2019
"ZZ AA a w—
SFB754 Data Legacy
ze
3°MN =
VN
I
3°G
L_
n
"—
“Ola
BA
___ te
36°W
— A dm
27° 49°W 9°W
FIGURE 4 | Cruise tracks of four SFB 754 crusies in the Atlantic Ocean in the third fundina period of the project (2016-2019)
on the focus of the cruise) were collected and measured
covering most CTDO casts (Tanhua and Mehrtens, 2021;
see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 10). Samples were
collected in 100 ml wide-necked WOCE glass bottles
with pre-defined volumes. Oxygen samples were collected
immediately after the CTDO cast was finished and always
directly after the sampling of transient tracers. The sample
bottles were flushed with at least three times its volume
and the samples were free of air-bubbles. Immediately
after sampling, the seawater samples were spiked from the
bottom with the fixation solutions (NaIl/NaOH and MnCl,).
Some 10 to 20% of the discrete samples were collected as
duplicates or triplicates in order to quantify sampling and
titration uncertainties.
The oxygen concentration was determined by Winkler
titration within a minimum of 40 min and a maximum of
L6 h after sampling following GO-SHIP best practices (Langdon,
2010). Details of oxygen measurements can be found in the
cruise reports (Table 1) of the individual cruises. For all
cruises, we followed the standard procedures for compensating
for impurities in the reagents and oxygen in the fixation
solution. On cruises in the Southeast Tropical Pacific very low
oxygen concentrations were found (well below 5 uWmol/kg)
and on the third set of cruises in the area (M135 to M138,
see Table 1) we additionally compensated for a presumed
sampling blank, i.e., contamination from air during sampling
and fixation, and outgassing from the PVC Niskin bottles.
The blank was determined by comparing titrated oxygen
concentrations in the central depths of the oxygen minimum
-rontiers in Marine Science | www.frontiersin.ore
layer where we had previously determined that there was
NO Oxygen present.
Nutrient Measurements
Nutrients were measured on-board for a sub-set of the cruises,
and on another sub-set the samples were frozen for post-cruise
processing in Kiel (Tanhua and Mehrtens, 2021; see Table 2
and Supplementary Table 10). Nutrient measurements on-board
were performed with QuAAtro gas-segmented continuous flow
analyzers (AutoAnalyzers) from SEAL Analytical. The exact
methods used are listed in the cruise reports (see Table 1) and
were normally: Nitrite and Nitrate - Q-068-05 Rev 11; Nitrite -
Q-070-05 Rev 6; Phosphate - Q-064-05 Rev 8; Silicate - Q-066-05
Rev 5. The precision of the nutrient measurements was calculated
as the average of the standard deviation from the replicate
measurements of samples, and are recorded in the cruise reports.
For the majority of the cruises where nutrients were measured
on-board, reference Material for Nutrients in Seawater (RMNS)
from the General Environmental Technos (KANSO) Co., Ltd.,
Osaka/Japan were used. Normally, reference material samples
were measured as triplicates at least once in every sampling run.
For nutrient analysis we followed the GO-SHIP best practices for
nutrient measurements (Hydes et al., 2010).
Transient Tracer Measurements
Three tracer release experiments were conducted during the
SFB 754 using the artificial tracer CF3SFs; two in the tropical
North Atlantic, and one in the tropical South Pacific (Tanhua
and Mehrtens, 2021; see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 10).
3eptember 2021 | Volume 8 | Article 72330«