31
Comparisons of the climatologies in 6-S space for two transects: across the Gulf Stream
and across the Antarctic Circumpolar Current are presented in Fig. 16. Both regions are
characterised by strong lateral property gradients, where isobaric/isopycnal averaging
effects are supposed to be especially pronounced. Indeed, our comparison reveals artificial
water masses in the WOA01 climatology. In the Gulf-Stream area within the potential
temperature range 6-15 degrees an artificial water mass is observed with salinities up to 0.1
greater, compared with observations. In the ACC region the WOA01 climatology is also
characterised by an anomalous water mass between ~2.5 and 6 °C, with salinity exceeding
observed values by 0.05-0.1.
An overview of these effects is given in Fig. 17, where temperature and salinity differences
between the WOA01 and WGHC climatologies are shown for the level 500 meters. A
number of pronounced geographical patterns are observed, with the largest anomalies
coinciding with such current systems, like Gulf-Stream, Kuroshio, Agulhas, and the ACC. It
should be kept in mind, however, that the WOA01 input data are not identical to those used
in our calculations. Therefore we repeated the calculations using the same optimal
interpolation algorithm and the same input data but on isobaric surfaces. The result of the
comparison allows to conclude, that most of the difference patterns of the Fig.16 are really
due to the effects of isobaric averaging of the data in WOA01 climatology.
Fig. 18: Depth-bin-averaged absolute deviation of WOA01 and WGHC
climatologies from the high-quality reference profile dataset.
Ratio is defined as |(f 0 bs-fwoAoi)|/|(fobs-fwGHc)l-
A comparison was done between the global reference (observed) data set and both
climatologies. Ratios of absolute differences |(T obs -T WO Aoi)|/|(Tobs-TwGHc)| and |(S obs -
SwoA0i)|/|(Sobs-SwGHc)l were computed for each observed T,S-pair. All depth-bin averaged
ratios are greater than unit (Fig. 18), indicating the WGHC climatology being closer to the
high-quality data compared with the WOA01 climatology. The largest differences are
observed in the deep water below 2000 m, where both temperature and salinity ratios
exceed 1.5. Ratios of absolute deviations from observations averaged within 1x1 degree
boxes and within the layer 250-500 meters are shown in Fig.19 and demonstrate a generally
much better agreement between the original observations and optimally interpolated fields
for the WGHC climatology.